Every claim, every source.

This Cell review by Saxton and David Sabatini — Sabatini being one of the original co-discoverers of mTOR — is the most-cited modern synthesis of mTOR signaling biology. The paper traces how mTOR (mechanistic target of rapamycin) integrates four classes of inputs: nutrients (amino acids, especially leucine and arginine), growth factors (insulin, IGF-1), cellular energy state (AMPK senses ATP:AMP), and stress signals. mTOR exists as two complexes: mTORC1, which controls protein synthesis, lipid synthesis, and inhibits autophagy; and mTORC2, which controls cytoskeletal organization and Akt phosphorylation. The review explains how mTORC1 activation drives anabolic programs (cell growth, protein synthesis) while suppressing catabolic programs (autophagy, lipolysis). Conversely, mTORC1 inhibition — by fasting, by rapamycin, by amino acid restriction, or by genetic loss — releases autophagy, increases lipolysis, and engages stress-resistance programs. The paper documents how dysregulated mTOR signaling drives cancer (mTOR is hyperactivated in most tumors), diabetes (mTORC1 contributes to insulin resistance), and aging (mTOR inhibition extends lifespan in every model organism tested). Therapeutic targeting of mTOR is an active drug-development area.

This Cell Metabolism paper from Valter Longo's USC group introduced the fasting-mimicking diet (FMD) — a 5-day periodic dietary protocol designed to deliver fasting's molecular benefits while keeping participants able to consume modest amounts of plant-based food. The paper has two parts. In aged mice, monthly FMD cycles for several months produced multi-system regeneration: hippocampal neurogenesis rose, IGF-1 dropped, PKA activity decreased, NeuroD1 expression increased, and cognitive performance improved on standard mouse cognition tests. In a 38-participant pilot human RCT, three monthly FMD cycles (each 5 days) produced reductions in body weight, body fat, blood pressure, fasting glucose, and IGF-1 without significant adverse events. The paper is foundational because it bridged rodent CR research and practical human protocol design — providing a structured, safe framework for delivering fasting benefits without continuous calorie restriction. Longo subsequently commercialized the protocol as ProLon, a packaged 5-day FMD product. The paper's data quality is solid but the commercial development complicates how it should be cited.

This Cell Metabolism paper combined a large NHANES-based human cohort (2,253 adults followed over 18 years) with mouse experiments to ask whether high protein intake — especially animal protein — drives cancer and mortality risk via IGF-1 and growth-hormone signalling. The headline finding is age-dependent. In adults aged 50–65, those reporting high protein intake (≥20 percent of calories from protein) had a 75 percent higher overall mortality and a fourfold higher cancer death risk over the next 18 years compared to low-protein eaters (under 10 percent of calories). The effect was largely abolished when the protein came from plant sources rather than animal sources. After age 65, the relationship reversed: high protein became protective for cancer and overall mortality — though high protein at any age was associated with a fivefold increase in diabetes mortality. Mouse experiments supported the mechanism: high-protein diets accelerated tumour growth and elevated IGF-1, while protein restriction did the opposite. The interpretation is that protein's relationship with longevity is not monotonic; it depends on age, on the protein source, and on what's being optimized for.

This Aging Cell paper directly addressed a paradox: rodent studies of caloric restriction reliably show IGF-1 reductions and longevity benefits, but the few existing human CR studies had not replicated the IGF-1 effect. Why? Fontana and colleagues compared three groups of human subjects: 28 long-term Calorie Restriction Society members (about 30 percent CR for 5+ years, but maintaining typical Western protein percentages around 24 percent of energy), 28 age-matched moderately protein-restricted vegans (around 10 percent of energy from protein), and 28 sedentary controls. The headline finding overturned the assumption that calories drive the IGF-1 effect: the strict CR group had no significant reduction in IGF-1 versus controls, while the vegans (heavier than the CR group, with more body fat) had significantly lower total and free IGF-1. The paper's conclusion is unambiguous: in humans, low protein intake — not low calorie intake — is what suppresses IGF-1. This finding helped explain why CR-induced longevity benefits in mice have not translated cleanly to humans on standard Western protein intakes, even at low calorie levels.