Verified · Tier 1 Primary
Indexed in the Sardine Protocol library since 2026
Alternate-day fasting in nonobese subjects: effects on body weight, body composition, and energy metabolism
Heilbronn LK, Smith SR, Martin CK, Anton SD, Ravussin E · 2005 · American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/81.1.69View source ↗
“Fasting insulin decreased 57 ± 4% (P less than 0.001).”
Summary
This is one of the foundational human alternate-day fasting trials, and — importantly — the actual source of the famous "57 percent insulin drop" claim that circulates widely in popular fasting content. Sixteen nonobese adults (8 men, 8 women) fasted every other day for 22 days. The protocol alternated full fasting days with normal eating days. Body weight dropped 2.5 percent and fat mass dropped 4 percent over the three weeks. Resting metabolic rate did not change significantly through day 21, but respiratory quotient fell on day 22 — indicating a clear shift toward fat oxidation, with daily fat oxidation rising by 15 grams or more. Glucose and ghrelin remained essentially stable, but fasting insulin dropped 57±4 percent. Hunger on fasting days remained elevated throughout the protocol, suggesting that adaptation to alternate-day hunger patterns does not happen quickly. The paper concluded that alternate-day fasting is feasible in nonobese adults and produces substantial fat-oxidation and insulin-sensitivity shifts, but adherence is challenging.
Talking it through with practitioners
The Inner Circle is a paid, async-first community for discussing what new evidence means for actual cycles — opening soon.
Citation graph
How this entry connects to the rest of the library
References cited by this entry
- ExtendsEffect of intermittent fasting and refeeding on insulin action in healthy menHalberg N et al. · 2005
The Halberg 2005 entry flagged the popular '57% insulin drop in 48 hours' claim as untraceable. Heilbronn 2005 is the actual source — the 57% figure is real, but it applies to 22 days of alternate-day fasting, not 48 hours. The popular reframing appears to be a misattribution.
- ExtendsA randomized pilot study comparing zero-calorie alternate-day fasting to daily caloric restriction in adults with obesityCatenacci VA et al. · 2016
Heilbronn 2005 was the small proof-of-concept ADF study; Catenacci 2016 ran a larger randomized comparison against ordinary caloric restriction.
Entries that reference this one
- ExtendsA randomized pilot study comparing zero-calorie alternate-day fasting to daily caloric restriction in adults with obesityCatenacci VA et al. · 2016
Heilbronn 2005 was the proof-of-concept ADF study in nonobese adults; Catenacci 2016 ran the head-to-head against ordinary daily caloric restriction in adults with obesity, finding equivalent metabolic outcomes.
Tags
Not medical advice. This page summarizes primary research. It is not a substitute for consultation with a qualified clinician. See safety for exclusion criteria.