Every claim, every source.

This study used data from the Canadian Study of Adolescent Health Behaviors — a national survey of 2,762 adolescents and young adults — to ask how common intermittent fasting is and whether it correlates with eating-disorder behaviors. The engagement numbers were striking: roughly 48 percent of women, 38 percent of men, and 52 percent of transgender or gender-non-conforming respondents reported practicing some form of intermittent fasting in the past 12 months. The researchers used the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire alongside modified Poisson regression to measure associations. Across all three gender groups, intermittent fasting in the past 12 months and the past 30 days was significantly associated with elevated eating-disorder psychopathology — disordered cognitions, restrictive behaviors, and binge-purge cycles. The pattern was strongest and most consistent in women. The authors do not claim fasting causes eating disorders; the data are cross-sectional and cannot prove direction. They argue clinicians screening young patients should treat self-reported intermittent fasting as a meaningful flag.

This Canadian government laboratory study tested 52 canned fish products from the 2014 Canadian retail market for bisphenol A (BPA) and three related compounds (BPB, BPE, BPF) using gas chromatography mass spectrometry. The headline finding: BPA was detectable in every one of the 52 products, but at substantially lower levels than a comparable study from five years earlier. The concentration range was 0.96 to 265 nanograms per gram, with an average of 28 ng/g. Three of the four BPA analogues were essentially absent — BPB and BPE were not detected in any product, and BPF appeared in only four samples at low concentrations (1.8 to 5.7 ng/g) — suggesting BPA is still the dominant epoxy resin used in current can liners. The few outliers above 100 ng/g came from a single newly-marketed brand, indicating that brand-level differences in liner formulation drive most of the variation. Industry-wide, the data show measurable downward progress in canned-fish BPA exposure.

This EFSA Scientific Committee statement weighs the cardiovascular and neurodevelopmental benefits of fish consumption against the risks of methylmercury exposure across the European population. It builds on EFSA's 2012 opinion which set the tolerable weekly intake (TWI) for methylmercury at 1.3 µg/kg body weight — meaning a 70 kg adult can safely consume about 91 µg/week. The 2015 statement identifies the dominant European mercury sources by species: tuna (the largest single contributor in adult diets), swordfish, cod, whiting, and pike. Notably, sardines are not on this high-mercury list. The statement acknowledges new epidemiological data (Seychelles cohort) showing that the long-chain omega-3s from fish may counteract some methylmercury toxicity — a benefit-risk tradeoff that favors lower-mercury species like sardines. EFSA's conclusion is risk-tiered: vulnerable groups (pregnant women, children, high-fish consumers up to 6× TWI) should choose lower-mercury species; the general adult population can consume fish at moderate intake without exceeding the TWI.

This study tested 17 different brands of canned sardines, sourced from six countries and bought at retail in eastern Kentucky, for the four most concerning heavy metals in fish: arsenic, cadmium, lead, and mercury. Each brand was analyzed as a composite of 3 to 4 fish using standard atomic-absorption laboratory methods. The headline finding for sardines was clear: mercury was below the 0.09 microgram-per-gram detection limit in every sample tested. That is well under the 1.0 microgram-per-gram FDA action level for predatory fish like tuna and swordfish, and roughly a tenth of the typical canned-tuna averages reported in FDA surveillance data. Arsenic was the highest of the four metals on average (1.06 µg/g), with the highest values appearing in samples from Norway and Thailand; cadmium was highest in Moroccan brands; lead was highest in Canadian brands. The study supports the narrow but important claim that commercial canned sardines, across multiple sourcing countries, are a low-mercury fish.

This JAMA evidence synthesis remains the most-cited single statement on whether fish consumption is, on balance, beneficial or harmful given the dual presence of cardioprotective omega-3 fatty acids and contaminants like methylmercury and PCBs. Mozaffarian and Rimm reviewed the strength of evidence on both sides for adults and for vulnerable groups (children, women of childbearing age) and reached an unambiguous conclusion: the benefits dominate the risks for adult populations. Their pooled estimate found that modest fish consumption — 1–2 servings per week, particularly fatty species rich in EPA and DHA — reduces coronary death risk by 36 percent and total mortality by 17 percent. They identified an EPA+DHA intake of about 250 mg/day as sufficient for primary cardiovascular prevention. For pregnant women and young children, they recommended species selection to minimize methylmercury exposure (avoiding swordfish, king mackerel, tilefish, shark) while still consuming two servings of lower-mercury fish per week. The paper's framing — benefits substantially outweigh risks — has anchored most subsequent dietary fish guidance.

This 12-year prospective cohort study of 47,150 men from the Health Professionals Follow-up Study is the canonical evidence on dietary purines and gout risk. Of the men who had no history of gout at baseline, 730 developed gout over the follow-up period. The headline findings: men in the highest quintile of meat consumption had a 41 percent higher risk of gout than those in the lowest quintile (relative risk 1.41), and men in the highest quintile of seafood consumption had a 51 percent higher risk (RR 1.51). Dairy intake worked the opposite direction — highest-quintile dairy was protective, with a 44 percent lower risk (RR 0.56). Notably, purine-rich vegetables (peas, beans, mushrooms, spinach, cauliflower) showed no association with gout risk despite their purine content. The mechanism appears to be that different purine sources convert to uric acid at different rates, and the food matrix matters as much as total purine load.

Anne Loucks's 2003 review consolidates a foundational principle for women's exercise and nutrition science: it is energy availability — calories left over after subtracting exercise expenditure from intake — that regulates reproductive function, not body fatness. Through a series of careful in-laboratory studies measuring LH (luteinizing hormone) pulsatility as a surrogate for menstrual cycle integrity, Loucks and colleagues found that reproductive disruption begins when energy availability falls below a threshold between 20 and 30 kcal per kilogram of lean body mass per day. Above the threshold, women maintain normal reproductive endocrine function; below it, even with adequate body fat, LH pulsatility breaks down and menstrual disruption follows. The implication is that "thinness" itself does not cause amenorrhea; sustained energy deficit does. The framework gave rise to the modern Female Athlete Triad and RED-S (Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport) clinical concepts, which are now standard in sports medicine. The 30 kcal/kg LBM/day threshold remains the most-cited clinical cutoff for evaluating energy-availability risk in active women.