Verified · Tier 1 Primary
Indexed in the Sardine Protocol library since 2026
Risk Factors That Predict Future Onset of Each DSM-5 Eating Disorder: Predictive Specificity in High-Risk Adolescent Females
Stice E, Gau JM, Rohde P, Shaw H · 2017 · Journal of Abnormal Psychology
DOI: 10.1037/abn0000219View source ↗
“Different eating disorder presentations are predicted by partly distinct sets of psychosocial and behavioral risk factors.”
Summary
This prospective cohort study followed 1,272 adolescent females over multiple years, identifying which baseline psychosocial and behavioral risk factors predicted the future onset of distinct DSM-5 eating disorders (anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorder, and other eating disorder presentations). The study design enabled differentiation among predictors — body dissatisfaction and dietary restriction predicted multiple eating-disorder onsets, but specific risk-factor profiles also distinguished anorexia onset from bulimia onset from binge-eating onset. Stice and colleagues are among the leading research groups in eating-disorder prevention; this paper supplies one of the cleaner empirical bases for who is at elevated risk for which eating-disorder presentation, with implications for how broader nutrition interventions should screen and refer at-risk participants.
Talking it through with practitioners
The free Skool community is where we discuss what new evidence means for actual cycles.
Citation graph
How this entry connects to the rest of the library
References cited by this entry
- SupportsIntermittent fasting: Describing engagement and associations with eating disorder behaviors and psychopathology among Canadian adolescents and young adultsGanson KT et al. · 2022
Ganson 2022 found intermittent fasting was associated with disordered eating behaviors; Stice 2017 supplies the broader risk-factor literature that contextualizes which adolescent and young-adult populations need protection from any restrictive intervention.
Tags
Not medical advice. This page summarizes primary research. It is not a substitute for consultation with a qualified clinician. See safety for exclusion criteria.